Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ... 9171819
Results 181 to 188 of 188

Thread: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...

  1. #181

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    Music Has Been Weaponized
    Since the 1940's ~ 432 hz to 440 hz

    Blessings and love,


    Last edited by lightbeing; 27th April 2020 at 02:11. Reason: Replacing video that has been taken down by YT

  2. #182

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...



    Blessings and love,


    Last edited by lightbeing; 27th April 2020 at 02:11. Reason: Replacing deleted YT video

  3. #183

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    Throwback Monday - Bill Majcher

    Blessings and love,


    Last edited by lightbeing; 27th April 2020 at 02:08. Reason: Replacing video that has been taken down by YT regarding Bill Majcher explaining world governments from behind the scenes

  4. #184

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    It's Time to Fire Dr Fauci and Fire Dr Tam

    Blessings and love,



  5. #185

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    A Doctor’s perspective

    Part 1/2

    Part 2/2

    Blessings and love,



  6. #186

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    Nurse on the Frontlines of COVID-19 Shares Her Experience

    By Dr. Mercola

    The heavily censored video above, "Perspectives on the Pandemic: Episode Nine," features an interview with Army veteran Erin Olszewski, a nurse turned private citizen journalist who for the past few months has cared for COVID-19 patients in Florida and New York. In this must-see interview, she shares her experiences at the two facilities.

    Elmhurst Hospital Center, a public hospital in Queens, New York, has been "the epicenter of the epicenter" of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. Few areas have been as hard hit as central Queens. The question is why?

    Initially, a shortage of ventilators was blamed for the exaggerated death toll. But it didn't take long before doctors recognized that mechanical ventilation did more harm than good in a majority of cases.

    Olszewski addresses a number of problems at Elmhurst, including the disproportionate mortality rate among people of color, the controversial rule surrounding Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, lax personal protective equipment (PPE) standards, and the failure to segregate COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients, thereby ensuring maximum spread of the disease among noninfected patients coming in with other health problems.

    Olszewski accepted a temporary transfer from Florida to New York and spent nearly four weeks at Elmhurst. What she witnessed spurred her to become an undercover reporter and whistleblower. She secretly recorded happenings in the hospital and posted warnings on social media. The standard of care at Elmhurst is so poor, Olszewski compares it to "a third-world country hospital."

    COVID-Negative Patients Placed on Ventilation

    The first topic Olszewski approaches is Elmhurst's case numbers. Patients who repeatedly tested negative for COVID-19 were still listed as confirmed positive and placed on mechanical ventilation, thus artificially inflating the numbers while more or less condemning the patient to death from lung injury.

    According to Olszewski, most patients who had difficulty breathing were immediately placed on mechanical ventilation. Many of these cases were likely nothing more than anxiety, she says. But why?

    Financial incentives appear to be at play. Elmhurst, a public hospital, is able to charge Medicaid and Medicare a lot more for COVID-19 patients than for other diagnoses. According to Olszewski, the hospital receives $29,000 extra for a COVID-19 patient receiving ventilation, over and above other treatments.

    Making matters worse, many of the doctors treating these patients are not trained in critical care. One of the "doctors" on the COVID floor is a dentist. Residents (medical students) are also relied on, "and they have no idea what they're doing," Olszewski says.

    Not only are they not properly trained in how to safely ventilate, residents are also unfamiliar with the drugs being used and are making errors — none of which are being investigated simply because we're in a pandemic.

    One resident instructed Olszewski to administer a dangerous drug at four times the safe speed — an error that would have killed the patient, had she followed the resident's instructions. According to Olszewski, residents are essentially using these patients for practice purposes, in many cases performing invasive procedures that are not necessary and will harm the patient.

    Interestingly, while the elderly are the most at-risk for COVID-19 worldwide, a majority of COVID-19 patients in Elmhurst hospital are in their 40s and 50s — very few are over 80 — and Olszewski guesses that only about half of those being treated for COVID-19 have actually tested positive.

    Elmhurst Purposely Allows COVID-19 Transmission

    What's worse, Elmhurst is mixing these patients together, meaning patients who have actually tested positive for COVID-19 are interspersed among patients with negative test results.

    "They're banking on the fact that they'll get it," Olszewski says, "because they're already immunocompromised." This despite the fact that they now have enough rooms in the hospital to separate these patients.

    It's murder. It's setting these people up for failure — based on money.

    In her undercover video, Olszewski talks about how a stroke patient ended up contracting the disease due to being placed in the same room as a COVID-positive patient. He ended up on mechanical ventilation, drastically increasing his chances of dying due to lung damage.

    Improper use of PPE further facilitates the spread of the virus. Elmhurst is also not using the rapid test, which gives you your test results in 45 minutes. It's more expensive, so they're not using it. Instead, they use a test that has a four- to five-day turnaround.

    In the meantime, infected and noninfected patients are being comingled, as patients suspected of having COVID-19 are admitted straight into the COVID unit.

    Elmhurst Patients Are Denied CPR

    She also discusses and plays recordings of arguments between nurses and a cardiac fellow (a fellow is a medical student who is one year away from practicing without direct supervision) in which the nurses are told to not resuscitate a 37-year-old patient in respiratory distress (who did not have COVID-19 yet was treated for it), even though he did not have a DNR order in place.

    The question is why? No answer was given, other than these orders were coming "from the top." "It's murder," Olszewski says. "It's setting these people up for failure — based on money." She's convinced that the 37-year-old man died as a direct result of being vented, and on top of it he was denied CPR.

    Part of why mechanical ventilation is so dangerous is because you are given sedatives and paralytics. You're essentially asleep for the duration, which could be up to a month.

    "There's no way you can recover from something like that," Olszewski says. What's worse, many patients are not even told that they're going to be sedated. In a chilling conversation, a physician states that not a single patient has been successfully extubated and released since the pandemic began.

    All patients who are put on ventilation die, and that's a majority of patients at Elmhurst, regardless of their actual infection status. Is it any wonder, then, that this Queens hospital is the "epicenter of the epicenter" of the pandemic? It's not due to rampant COVID-19 though.

    Stark Contrast — Private Hospital in Florida

    Olszewski's experience in a private hospital in her home state of Florida is in stark contrast to that of Elmhurst. In Florida, they would treat each patient as needed, rather than driving them toward ventilation as quickly as possible. They also did not treat uninfected patients as if they had COVID-19.

    One of the treatment protocols used on COVID-19 patients in Florida was hydroxychloroquine and zinc. Not one patient died. When asked why she thinks hydroxychloroquine has been demonized in the media, she says, "Because it works and then people won't need vents." Meanwhile, New York Gov. Cuomo restricted the dispensing of hydroxychloroquine. In New York, the drug can only be dispensed:1

    • When written as prescribed for a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indication; or

    ◦ As part of a state approved clinical trial related to COVID-19 for a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19

    ◦ As part of a state approved clinical trial related to COVID-19 for a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19. (Positive COVID-19 test result must be documented as part of the prescription.)

    Cuomo has prohibited the use of hydroxychloroquine for experimental prophylactic use, which is what President Trump was using it for. Cuomo "wants to be right," Olszewski says. "They got all these [ventilators]; they want to use them." Cuomo has also granted New York hospitals immunity from malpractice lawsuits during the pandemic.

    All of this is now moot, however, as the FDA revoked emergency approval of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 on June 16, 2020.2 Could it be that a course of treatment is about $100 with hydroxychloroquine while that of its popular antiviral competitor, Remdesivir, is around $4,000?

    The Hydroxychloroquine Cover-Up Blows Up

    The video includes statements from doctors who vouch for the safety and effectiveness of the hydroxychloroquine regimen against COVID-19, and discusses the fraudulent study in the Lancet, used by detractors to drive the narrative that hydroxychloroquine doesn't work and can be dangerous.

    It even stopped hydroxychloroquine trials from proceeding around the world, and the World Health Organization and governments altered their COVID-19 policies based on this fraudulent paper.

    Once experts blew the whistle, demanding the paper's authors provide evidence that the data were reliable, the paper was withdrawn. The New England Journal of Medicine retracted another hydroxychloroquine paper for the same reason, as the data came from the same suspect organization: Surgisphere. As reported by STAT news June 2, 2020:3

    "'This is not for the faint of heart,' said Harlan Krumholz, director of the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at Yale New Haven Hospital. 'This is not just a matter of dial-a-study when you get access to data.

    Well-done studies are based on understanding the provenance of the data and making sure what you are doing is reasonable. There is good science to be done with big databases, but there are also major mistakes to be made. The question is: What happened here?'

    Both studies in question used data from Surgisphere, a little-known company based in Chicago that claimed in the Lancet study to have data from 671 hospitals on six continents.

    The Lancet paper4 found that the malaria drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, which had been explored as potential therapies for Covid-19, did not correspond with improved outcomes for patients, and were also associated with higher mortality.

    The paper5 in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that blood pressure medications were not associated with worse outcomes in patients with Covid-19. The studies share some of the same authors, including Sapan Desai, who runs Surgisphere."

    Surgisphere Fraud Runs Deep

    Since then, investigations into Surgisphere and its chief executive Desai has revealed the deception runs far deeper than those two studies. According to The Guardian:6

    "Further inquiries by the Guardian into Surgisphere and its founder and chief executive, Dr. Sapan Desai, have confirmed that:

    Major institutions including Stanford University, which were described as research partners on the Surgisphere website, said they were not aware of any formal relationship with the company.

    A study that formed the basis of Desai's Ph.D. may contain doctored images, according to expert claims, and the global medical publishing company Elsevier is conducting a review of his papers published in its journals.

    Claims made by Desai about his qualifications gained since his medical degree have been called into doubt, including his claims to hold two Ph.D.'s, a master's, and affiliations with major universities and colleges. Some of these affiliations have now been removed from his website and online profiles."

    Other Surgisphere employees include a science fiction editor, a fantasy artist and an adult content model. The company's Twitter handle has fewer than 170 followers and up until recently, its website contact link redirected visitors to a WordPress template for a cryptocurrency site.7 Just how did a paper originating from this obvious sham of a company end up carrying so much weight within the WHO?

    Government Should Not Dictate Medical Treatment

    Olszewski brings up an important point, which is that government should never have gotten involved in issuing COVID-19 treatment directives. The treatment should be personalized to the patient, based on the symptoms they're presenting, and politicians should have no say in what treatment is chosen. "It's none of their business," she says.

    Aside from hydroxychloroquine and zinc, which needs to be administered in the early stages of the disease, Olszewski talks about how she inquired about the use of high-dose vitamin C, which Asian studies have shown to be effective in cases of severe COVID-19.

    A secret tape recording reveals the mindset of an Elmhurst physician, who roundly dismisses any and all treatments aside from ventilation as useless, since he expects 90% of his patients to die anyway. It's a chilling conversation.

    There is much to learn from this pandemic. One take-home is that top-down pandemic treatment directives are ill advised. The WHO and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have turned out to be less than reliable and trustworthy in this regard, and the decisions by some political heads of state have been disastrous.

    Why have governors not relied on the input of medical professionals who are actually working with patients and reporting excellent results? Why have so many doctors and scientists been suppressed and censored rather than listened to? Why are inexpensive and readily available remedies that are proving effective being dismissed and ridiculed?

    The ineptitude and callousness demonstrated by top level leadership during this pandemic has been staggering, and future pandemic planning clearly needs to rely less on big pharma pushers like Bill Gates and WHO, and more on local critical care teams.

    Unfortunately, we're now on a speeding train toward totalitarianism ushered in under the guise of a pandemic response, and the question is, can we stop it? I believe we must try. If we don't, things will only get worse from here.

    For article and links: Mercola

    Blessings and love,



  7. #187

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    What Is Causing the Spike
    in COVID-19 Cases?

    Blessings and love,



  8. #188

    Re: Stuff You're Not Supposed To Know About...


    Nobel Laureate Calls COVID-19 Manmade

    By Dr. Mercola

    July 17, 2020

    The explanations of COVID-19's origins by mainstream media simply do not add up and scientists are increasingly speaking out about this. Many experts theorize that the virus is manmade and was synthesized in a laboratory because the peculiarities of the virus' genome that make it so transmittable could not have occurred in nature.

    Experts who suspect COVID-19 has lab origins have strong evidence on their side. Research between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to increase the infectivity and deadliness of a SARS-like coronavirus has indeed been conducted.1

    The coronavirus experimental collaborations, called "gain-of-function" (GOF) research, were curtailed by the U.S. between 2014 and 2018 because of their obvious risks, but in 2017 the NIH announced the research would be resumed.2

    Scientists willing to challenge the mainstream explanations of COVID-19's origin face a backlash from their colleagues and scientific associations and have even been dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." However, a new voice has been added to the body of scientific dissenters that will likely add to the credibility of their COVID-19 viewpoints.

    French virologist Luc Antoine Montagnier, who was awarded a Nobel prize in Physiology in 2008 along with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald zur Hausen for discovering of the HIV virus,3 has now spoken out. Montagnier was a researcher at the prestigious Pasteur Institute in Paris.4
    COVID-19 Was Manmade, Says Nobel Laureate

    Many in the scientific community were shocked when the acclaimed Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show, CNews, on April 17, 20205 to say that the virus that causes COVID-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite that causes malaria, are found in the coronavirus's genome.6 Montagnier said:7

    "We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [has] sequences of another virus, which is HIV."

    The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31, 2020, and has since been withdrawn. The researchers wrote:8

    "We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag ...

    The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature."

    COVID-19 Derives From a Failed HIV Vaccine, Says Montagnier

    In a separate appearance on the French podcast Pourquoi Docteur, also April 17,9 Montagnier said the coronavirus had escaped in an "industrial accident" while Chinese scientists at the Wuhan city laboratory were trying to develop a vaccine against HIV.10 "In order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory," said Montagnier.11

    Montagnier also said he believes that the pandemic will naturally extinguish itself because of its synthetic origins:12

    "Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths."

    According to the website Corvelva, Montagnier said on the podcast that the pandemic would peter out because nature would override the synthetically inserted sequences that make COVID-19 so deadly:13

    "With the help of interfering waves, we could eliminate these sequences ... and consequently stop the pandemic. But it would take many means available."

    Montagnier Created His Theory With a Biomathematics Expert

    Montagnier says he reached his conclusions, "With my colleague, biomathematician Jean-Claude Perez," after they "carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus."14 Montagnier's partner, Perez, is a French interdisciplinary scientist and biomathematics expert.15

    According to an online bio, Perez has proved that DNA coding for genes is structured by proportions related to Fibonacci numbers,16 which are formulas in mathematics that are sometimes called "nature's secret code."17 In a paper Montagnier and Perez published on the Center for Open Science in April 2020, they write:18

    "Using our proprietary bio-mathematic approach we are able to evaluate the level of cohesion and organization of a genome; ... we then searched in this genome for possible traces of HIV or even SIV [related simian immunodeficiency virus]. A first publication reports the discovery of 6 HIV SIV RNA pieces."

    The HIV and SIV elements that Montagnier and Perez detect, called Exogenous Informative Elements, or EIEs, provide the basis of their theory that COVID-19 is not a simple derivative of SARS and bat-related viruses. They write:19

    "A major part of these 16 EIE already existed in the first SARS genomes as early as 2003. However, we demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV1 HIV2 Exogenous Informative Elements radically distinguishes all COVID-19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains ...

    ... a contiguous region representing 2.49% of the whole COVID-19 genome is 40.99% made up of 12 diverse EIE originating from various strains of HIV SIV retroviruses ...

    a novel long region of around 225 nucleotides, appears to us to be totally new: this region is completely absent in ALL SARS genomes, whereas it is present and 100% homologous for all COVID-19 genomes listed in NCBI or GISAID COVID_19 genomic databases."

    More About Montagnier and Perez's Theory

    After in-depth sequencing of related genomes from many different countries, regions of countries and time periods using their proprietary biomathematic approach, Montagnier and Perez say their research enabled them to:20

    "… demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV/SIV EIE radically distinguishes all COVID- 19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains."

    They also find the presence of plasmodium yoelii in the COVID-19 genome, a parasite used in studies of "mice vaccine strategies." This is another EIE not originally in the SARS and bat-related viruses, say Montagnier and Perez.21

    "An analysis of amino acid homologies confirms the very probable insertion of this EIE [plasmodium yoelii] in COVID-19."

    As they decode the genomes of myriad COIVID-19 "relatives" in their research paper, Montagnier and Perez detect mutations in which the viruses seem to be trying to "rid" themselves of the exogenous EIEs, which the researchers believe were inserted deliberately.22

    The virus mutations seem to verify Montagnier's Pourquoi Docteur podcast predictions about how nature will eliminate "unnatural changes" — the reason he is hopeful the pandemic will come to a natural ending.23
    Other Researchers Agree With Montagnier and Perez

    Since Montagnier's comments to French media, other researchers have agreed that COVID-19 appears manmade, with insertions that hint at lab construction. In June 2020, research published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics makes similar claims.24 Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish refer to COVID-19 as a "chimeric virus" and write:25

    "We show the non-receptor dependent phagocytic general method of action to be specifically related to cumulative charge from inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface in positions to bind efficiently by salt bridge formations; and from blasting the Spike we display the non human-like epitopes from which Biovacc-19 has been down-selected."

    While conceding the Quarterly Review of Biophysics assertions were controversial, the scientific website Minerva wrote that the science should be pursued.26

    "Minerva has read a draft of the article, and has after an overall assessment decided that the findings and arguments do deserve public debate, and that this discussion cannot depend entirely on the publication process of scientific journals."

    Like Montagnier, Sørensen's background is HIV research work and he launched a new immunotherapy for HIV in 2008 that was acclaimed.27 In an interview with Minerva about his recent contentious research, he says:28

    "We have examined which components of the virus are especially well suited to attach themselves to cells in humans. And we have done this by comparing the properties of the virus with human genetics. What we found was that this virus was exceptionally well adjusted to infect humans ... So well that it was suspicious."

    The Sunday Times of London Weighs In

    I previously interviewed virologist Jonathan Latham, and he expanded on his uncovering of this nondisclosed Wuhan virus. You can see more in the video below.

    LINK to video:

    There are many unexplained circumstances surrounding the discovery and spread of COVID-19, which inspired The Times of London to launch an in-depth investigation that was recently published.29 For example, the newspaper notes that a virus similar to COVID-19 appeared on the scene much earlier than was reported.30

    "The world's closest known relative to the Covid-19 virus was found in 2013 by Chinese scientists in an abandoned mine where it was linked to deaths caused by a coronavirus-type respiratory illness."

    Among the many unanswered questions was why the deaths of six men in China in 2012, who had been exposed to a bat virus and quickly developed severe pneumonia, were covered up by Chinese authorities. According to The Times:31

    "All the men were linked. They had been given the task of clearing out piles of bat feces in an abandoned copper mine in the hills south of the town of Tongguan ... Some had worked for two weeks before falling ill, and others just a few days ... while none had tested positive for SARS, all four had antibodies against another, unknown Sars-like coronavirus."

    A research paper titled "Coexistence of Multiple Coronaviruses in Several Bat Colonies in an Abandoned Mineshaft," cowritten by Shi Zhengli, a researcher known in China as the "Bat Woman," makes "no mention of why the study had been carried out: the miners, their pneumonia and the deaths," says the Times.32

    The deaths from the apparently new bat-related respiratory virus were also blacked out by Chinese media, says The Times, and could only be gleaned from a "master's thesis by a young medic called Li Xu."33

    Adding to the many questions about the virus' origins, wrote The Times, was the fact that "of the 41 patients who contracted Covid-19 in Wuhan only 27" had contact with the Huanan seafood market, which was officially named as the source. Moreover, a longtime bat researcher exposed to bat blood and urine who subsequently fell ill and might have been "patient zero" refused to talk to reporters.34

    Thanks to the "gain-of-function" research that was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, well-founded fears of escaped or leaked viruses preceded the acknowledgement of COVID-19 and were increased by China's lack of transparency. For example, wrote The Times, even the fact that COVID-19 could be spread between humans was hidden:35

    "China would not admit there had been human-to-human transmission until January 20, despite sitting on evidence the virus had been passed to medics."

    The True Nature of COVID-19 Remains Hidden

    According to The Times, a sample of the virus that killed six in 2012 was housed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was described in a scientific paper cowritten by Shi that states it is a 96.2% match to the COVID-19 virus.36 The virus, called RaTG13, says The Times:

    "… was the biggest lead available as to the origin of Covid-19. It was therefore surprising that the paper gave only scant detail about the history of the virus sample, stating merely that it was taken from a Rhinolophus affinis bat in Yunnan province in 2013 — hence the "Ra" and the 13.

    Inquiries have established, however, that RaTG13 is almost certainly the coronavirus discovered in the abandoned mine in 2013, which had been named RaBtCoV/4991 in the institute's earlier scientific paper. For some reason, Shi and her team appear to have renamed it."

    According to The Times, the obfuscation about how long the virus has been known to exist and its origins continues. In an interview with Scientific American, says The Times, Shi:37

    "… mentions the discovery of a coronavirus that 96% matches the Covid-19 virus, and has a reference to the miners dying in a cave she investigated. However, the two things are not linked and Shi downplays the significance of the miners' deaths by claiming they succumbed to a fungus."

    Was COVID-19 Created in a Lab?

    With the many cover-ups and misleading information surrounding the coronavirus and resulting pandemic, is it possible COVID-19 came from a lab and was manmade? On this point, The Times is agnostic.38

    "The final and trickiest question for the WHO inspectors [who investigated the virus in China] is whether the virus might have escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan. Is it possible, for example, that RaTG13 or a similar virus turned into Covid-19 and then leaked into the population after infecting one of the scientists at the Wuhan institute?

    This seriously divides the experts. The Australian virologist Edward Holmes has estimated that RaTG13 would take up to 50 years to evolve the extra 4% that would make it a 100% match with the Covid-19 virus."

    Most of the mainstream media as well as the scientific community continue to dismiss such ideas. But the addition of the voices of a Nobel Laureate and well-known Norwegian researcher give the theory greater credibility. There are other questions unexplored by media, too.
    Was COVID-19 Intended as a Bioweapon?

    If COVID-19 were manmade and leaked from a laboratory, there is another pressing question. Was the synthesized virus intended as a bioweapon? In a published paper, Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist,39 wrote that such genetic engineering techniques have "resulted in biological weapons that were tested, well-described and, in some cases, used."40

    Many are unaware of just how many Biological Safety Levels (BSL) 3 and 4 labs there are in the world. They are found in the U.S., China, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, The Czech Republic, France, Gabon, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.41 People are also unaware of how often leaks occur.

    For example, in 2017 at the BSL 4 lab on Galveston Island, there were serious questions about what happened to pathogens housed there after it was hit by a massive storm and severe flooding.42 Only two years later, the BSL 4 lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland, was temporarily shut down after protocol violations.43

    When Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, the greater New Orleans area housed at least five BSL 3 labs that were studying anthrax, HIV, SARS, West Nile and genetically engineered mouse pox. According to The Daily Bruin:44

    "The National Primate Research Center, located at Tulane, housed nearly 5,000 monkeys in outdoor cages for 'infectious disease, including biodefense-related work, gene therapy, reproductive biology and neuroscience,' according to an article in Tulane University Magazine."

    The CDC Has Had Several BSL Safety Breaches and Accidents

    Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has had leaks in its home-based Atlanta facility. In June 2012, the agency made headline news when an inspector reported that a building housing anthrax, SARS and monkeypox in one of its bioterror labs had a noticeable air leak. This was following similar reports in 2007 and 2008. Of the 2012 incident, ABC News said:45

    "The documents suggest a breach in biosafety regulations, imposed nationwide by the CDC itself, that dictate labs housing the most dangerous inhalable infectious agents must be maintained under 'negative pressure.'"

    The CDC just seems to keep having accidents. For example, in June 2014, the CDC released a public statement46 stating "… approximately 75 Atlanta-based staff are being monitored after being exposed to live anthrax when … established safety practices were not followed."

    The CDC then pledged to do internal reviews of lab-safety policies and procedures. Six months later, in December 2014, Reuters47 reported that the CDC had created a new, high-level safety position to "identify problems, establish plans to solve them, and hold programs throughout CDC accountable for follow-up."

    But, in 2016, it happened again: Problems in an Atlanta BSL-4 lab working "with deadly Ebola and smallpox viruses and other pathogens that lack vaccines or reliable treatments" developed when safety seals and backup safety measures on its labs failed.48

    In reporting on this incident, USA Today obtained copies of reports from a 2009 incident, and learned that certain CDC officials tried to hide the problems. USA Today asked Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University biosafety expert who has testified before Congress on these issues, to look at the reports and to give his opinion on the CDC's actions. Ebright said:

    "Overall, the incident shows that failures — even cascading, compounding, catastrophic failures of BSL-4 biocontainment labs occur … And the attempted cover-up within the CDC makes it clear that the CDC cannot be relied upon to police its own, much less other institutions."

    The CDC responded that "there was never any risk posed by the lab's equipment failures." What other accidents have we yet to hear about? If we are ever going to get a handle on this, we must listen to the experts on this topic, many whom I have interviewed. Although there may have been some valid research taking place at one time, most of these bioweapon labs are dangerous and should be shut down.

    For article and links: Mercola

    Blessings and love,



Similar Threads

  1. Stuff You Need to Know...
    By Tango in forum Consciousness Learning Area
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23rd September 2013, 02:44


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts